Table of Contents:
  • Part I: The issues in perspective
  • 1. Evolution of the debate
  • 2. Sentencing guidelines
  • Part II: The conception of desert
  • 3. Why punish proportionately?
  • 4. Proportionality: determining or limiting?
  • 5. Why punish at all?
  • Part III: How much punishment is deserved?
  • 6. Gauging the seriousness of crimes
  • 7. Previous convictions
  • 8. Anchoring the penalty scale
  • Part IV: Selective incapacitation
  • 9. Predictive efficacy
  • 10. Impact on crime rates and prison populations
  • 11. Ethical problems: the "no conflict" thesis
  • 12. Prediction within broad desert limits?
  • Part V: Synthesizing past and future
  • 13. Categorial incapacitation
  • 14. Strategies for synthesis
  • 15. Concluding observations
  • Appendixes: 1. The question of false positives
  • 2. A note on Minnesota's sentencing guidelines.